Blogs
Home > Blogs > Inside Opinion
Recent Post

Seven years is long enough - let's fill in the **** hole

Posted September 11, 2008 9:41:06 AM

The question is not 'what have we learned' since 9/11 but 'what are we teaching' the next generation about how to deal with a catastrophe?

  • Email this post
  • Print this post
Recent Post

Two views on Schwarzenegger recall

Posted September 10, 2008 12:41:26 PM

In our Thursday edition, we will editorialize against the California Correctional Peace Officers Association's recall targeting Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. The union portrays this as a response to Schwarzenegger's ineffectiveness, citing the state budget standoff. They don't mention that they're at impasse in contract talks, and Schwarzenegger doesn't take their enormous campaign contributions, which proved so effective in shaking down previous governors (both Democrat Gray Davis and Republican Pete Wilson).

Joe Matthews, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation, makes an interesting case for a different approach in a commentary published Tuesday in the Los Angeles Times. We may publish this later this week, but here's a thumbnail version: Matthews says Schwarzenegger ought to adopt the recall and help get it on the ballot, then treat it like the snap elections called by parliamentary-style governments such as those in Canada and Europe. He reasons that if Schwarzenegger loses, gridlock in Sacramento becomes someone else's headache. But if he wins, Schwarzenegger can claim a mandate for his compromise proposals that have been bogged down in the Legislature.

Here's a link to the Matthews' column.

What do you think?

-- Jim Sweeney

  • Email this post
  • Print this post
Recent Post

Palin is Teflon right now - with lipstick

Posted September 10, 2008 7:09:45 AM

Obama needs to be careful how he goes after GOP veep without distancing himself from white, female voters.

  • Email this post
  • Print this post
Recent Post

Editorial Board interviews begin . . .

Posted September 9, 2008 9:43:24 AM

What questions would you like us to ask the candidates?

  • Email this post
  • Print this post
Recent Post

Change to spare

Posted September 5, 2008 12:27:42 PM

Know this: Change is a word you will hear over and over again during the fall campaign.

It's been a watchword for Barack Obama from the start. His strongest appeal has been his talk of generational change and new approaches to politics and public policy.

After spending much of the summer challenging Obama's credentials to lead, John McCain served notice in his acceptance speech that he too will promise change.

And there's a good reason why both candidates want to claim this one-word platform. This election is likely to decided by moderate and independent voters in swing states, and as a group they're tired of bickering, posturing and inaction. Whichever candidate wins these voters over wins the election.

McCain certainly had them in mind when he delivered these lines on Thursday:

-- "Americans want us to stop yelling at each other."

-- "I fight to restore the pride and principles of our party," he said. "We were elected to change Washington, and we let Washington change us."

-- "You know, I've been called a maverick, someone who marches to the beat of his own drum," he said. "Sometimes it's meant as a compliment and sometimes it's not. What it really means is I understand who I work for. I don't work for a party. I don't work for a special interest. I don't work for myself. I work for you."

There was humility in his speech, a trait not seen often enough in public life.

It will be a challenge (and it should be) to persuade voters that he brings change after 30 years as part of the Washington establishment and as the nominee of a party that controlled Congress for 12 of the past 14 years, the White House for going on seven years and seven of nine seats on the U.S. Supreme Court.

But McCain offered a credible case for himself. The most effective part of his speech came near the end, when he described himself as an imperfect public servant, whose commitment to public service was forged by his experience as a prisoner of war.

Much of the rest of the convention stood in sharp contrast to McCain's words, with sophomoric attacks that at times overlooked McCain's own positions (For all the talk about rights for terrorists, it was McCain who sponsored a bill that would have granted rights to prisoners at Guantanomo). So where Obama must show voters that he has ideas to match his ideals, McCain must show voters that his party shares his ideals.

Where does Sarah Palin fit in all this? My guess is her role will be working the Republican base - leading the attacks and reassuring conservatives - while McCain heads back to the middle and tries to take the mantle of change away from Obama.

The first debate is Sept. 26, three weeks from today, at the University of Mississippi. It should be a rollicking good show.

-- Jim Sweeney

  • Email this post
  • Print this post
Recent Post

More tests coming for Palin

Posted September 4, 2008 11:39:36 AM

No question Sarah Palin passed her first test with high marks. She was confident, engaging, likeable. And she certainly displayed the Teleprompter skills you expect from a former TV reporter. Her family is attractive - the TV cameras (and no doubt viewers) loved young Piper licking her hand and fixing baby Trig.

But this was about as friendly an audience as she is going to get. There's not much risk in ripping the media or warning about taxes at a Republican convention. And, for the most part, she was reading someone else's words. Her story, delivered well, ghostwritten.

The next test comes over the next few days. That's when we'll see how the other part of her speech - the attacks on Barack Obama -- played outside the convention hall, especially with independents and conservative Democrats. Palin jumped into the traditional No. 2 role, hitting Obama hard for weaknesses real (inexperience, limited legislative record) and perceived (detachment, celebrity). With her own limited experience, we don't yet know if she'll be a credible surrogate. Remember Dan Quayle in 1988? Republicans better hope the other memory of 1988 is stronger with voters - you remember, Democrats wondering why they didn't nominate Lloyd Bentsen instead of Michael Dukakis.

Also yet to be seen is how she'll handle herself when she gets stuck in front of a news conference - and she will be. She has to answer questions about seeking congressional earmarks as mayor of Wasilla, her apparent flip-flop on the Bridge to Nowhere and the ongoing ethics investigation in Alaska. That will give us a chance to see how she thinks on her feet. Again a parallel to 1988 - look for that first press conference to be staged with a cheering (jeering?) section arrayed around the reporters.

-- Jim Sweeney

  • Email this post
  • Print this post